Infinity

Is a term used to define a concept.

It is a word chosen to describe the otherwise indescribable.

A word chosen to designate some idea that would otherwise require lengthy explantation.

I have seen a theory presented in various maths forums that there are in fact different sizes of infinity. Or that one infinity may contain more or less elements than another infinite set.

But the way I’ve described that should put the notion to rest. There cannot be multiple sizes for a word that describes endless size. There is no end. There can never be a “new” number that isn’t already part of infinity.

It does not matter how much you obfuscate the issue behind different arrangements of grids, or multiple, additional infinite sets of “additional” numbers, or names, or letters A, or B, or whether the number is represented in dec, hex, or bin. Making a diagonal line through an endless graph still just results in an endless line. You never reach an end where there is the “additional” one that is somehow different. Every time you “find” a new number, guess what.

You’ll find it’s already accounted for, included right there already comfortable in it’s room, as an integral part of infinity. Because it if wasn’t, then it was never infinity in the first place.

So, I don’t know if there’s any quantum mathematics calculations being made working with different sizes for infinity. But if there are … your calculations are off.